<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: SANS: Is Eco-Fashion an Oxymoron?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ecouterre.com/33/sans-is-eco-fashion-an-oxymoron/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.ecouterre.com/33/sans-is-eco-fashion-an-oxymoron/</link> <description>Sustainable Fashion</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:50:15 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Michael Radparvar &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Slow Up in 2010 -</title><link>http://www.ecouterre.com/33/sans-is-eco-fashion-an-oxymoron/#comment-2247</link> <dc:creator>Michael Radparvar &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Slow Up in 2010 -</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 03:21:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecouterre.com/?p=33#comment-2247</guid> <description>[...] Uluru and of course, the innovative concepts of Sans.  As Lika Volkova, founder of Sans contends &#8211; fashion technically cannot &#039;be eco&#039; since it is continuously producing, but it is [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Uluru and of course, the innovative concepts of Sans.  As Lika Volkova, founder of Sans contends &#8211; fashion technically cannot &#39;be eco&#39; since it is continuously producing, but it is [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Slow Up in 2010 &#171; The Holstee Team Blog</title><link>http://www.ecouterre.com/33/sans-is-eco-fashion-an-oxymoron/#comment-2175</link> <dc:creator>Slow Up in 2010 &#171; The Holstee Team Blog</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 22:27:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecouterre.com/?p=33#comment-2175</guid> <description>[...] Loomstate, Uluru and of course, the innovative concepts of Sans. As Lika Volkova, founder of Sans contends &#8211; fashion technically cannot &#8216;be eco&#8217; since it is continuously producing, but it [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Loomstate, Uluru and of course, the innovative concepts of Sans. As Lika Volkova, founder of Sans contends &#8211; fashion technically cannot &#8216;be eco&#8217; since it is continuously producing, but it [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Meaghan Orlinski</title><link>http://www.ecouterre.com/33/sans-is-eco-fashion-an-oxymoron/#comment-6</link> <dc:creator>Meaghan Orlinski</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:26:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecouterre.com/?p=33#comment-6</guid> <description>While this woman is very intelligent and makes interesting points, her argument has a lot of holes in it, and in fact is a bit hypocritical and not well thought out.Well, who says that because people make it at home it will fit or be of good quality? Home sewn clothes may also not fit and be worn only once, left to rot in the back of a closet OR half finished in a &#039;to-do&#039; pile instead of a warehouse.  Let us not forget that sewing is a developed skill, that takes years to develop properly to ensure durability and fit. She makes it seem like anyone sitting in front of a Singer can be a tailor.Also, her methodology of production would mean that everyone would have to go and purchase sewing machines, surgers, button hole makers, and other tools and machines to make their clothes... if every household had to purchase and run these, it wouldn&#039;t be very sustainable or economical, would it? Where does the electricity come to power home sewing machines? Then everyone would have to drive to stores and tansport their fabrics to their own individual houses. That may not be very sustainable either. Logistics play a huge role in sustainability. Where does the fabric you buy &quot;from your local store&quot; come from?  Probably from china, from fabric sales points. Why not produce it in a factory in China if that where the fabric comes from anyway? Then it at least gets produced in factories that generally currently now recycle fabric scraps.Another point is who has time to make all those clothes? Designers like this usually spend very little time in front of their sewing machines producing anything but their samples- sometimes not even that. They forget how time consuming sewing is. Mass production - or outsourcing the production of your clothes- actually lead women to have more time to do things like develop a career. I&#039;m not devaluing sewing at home, nor am I validating mass sweat shops that take advantage of developing classes in countries with corrupt and lax labour laws- but it is something to be considered.This woman has an interesting concept- and her clothing is beautiful. It puts the VOGUE patterns of old to shame. Most major fashion labels in the 1800&#039;s to the present produce patterns to buy and sew at home. You know, the patterns that also never got purchased and sit around in the backs of fabric land or were sent to the landfill... oh now you can download them from her. We all know how sustainable computer and printer production is. E-waste isn&#039;t an issue, right?Patterns and home sewing have died off for a reason. It&#039;s not something new or radical. It&#039;s not pioneering or building a new path. SANS just does it with a neo-sustainable, ungrounded modernist attitude, that&#039;s all.I also find people who smoke (usually putting money in the pockets of huge and ethicalless corporations) a wee bit out of touch with what they preach. You know the average smoking habit takes 300 trees a year to support?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While this woman is very intelligent and makes interesting points, her argument has a lot of holes in it, and in fact is a bit hypocritical and not well thought out.</p><p>Well, who says that because people make it at home it will fit or be of good quality? Home sewn clothes may also not fit and be worn only once, left to rot in the back of a closet OR half finished in a &#8216;to-do&#8217; pile instead of a warehouse.  Let us not forget that sewing is a developed skill, that takes years to develop properly to ensure durability and fit. She makes it seem like anyone sitting in front of a Singer can be a tailor.</p><p>Also, her methodology of production would mean that everyone would have to go and purchase sewing machines, surgers, button hole makers, and other tools and machines to make their clothes&#8230; if every household had to purchase and run these, it wouldn&#8217;t be very sustainable or economical, would it? Where does the electricity come to power home sewing machines? Then everyone would have to drive to stores and tansport their fabrics to their own individual houses. That may not be very sustainable either. Logistics play a huge role in sustainability. Where does the fabric you buy &#8220;from your local store&#8221; come from?  Probably from china, from fabric sales points. Why not produce it in a factory in China if that where the fabric comes from anyway? Then it at least gets produced in factories that generally currently now recycle fabric scraps.</p><p>Another point is who has time to make all those clothes? Designers like this usually spend very little time in front of their sewing machines producing anything but their samples- sometimes not even that. They forget how time consuming sewing is. Mass production &#8211; or outsourcing the production of your clothes- actually lead women to have more time to do things like develop a career. I&#8217;m not devaluing sewing at home, nor am I validating mass sweat shops that take advantage of developing classes in countries with corrupt and lax labour laws- but it is something to be considered.</p><p>This woman has an interesting concept- and her clothing is beautiful. It puts the VOGUE patterns of old to shame. Most major fashion labels in the 1800&#8217;s to the present produce patterns to buy and sew at home. You know, the patterns that also never got purchased and sit around in the backs of fabric land or were sent to the landfill&#8230; oh now you can download them from her. We all know how sustainable computer and printer production is. E-waste isn&#8217;t an issue, right?</p><p>Patterns and home sewing have died off for a reason. It&#8217;s not something new or radical. It&#8217;s not pioneering or building a new path. SANS just does it with a neo-sustainable, ungrounded modernist attitude, that&#8217;s all.</p><p>I also find people who smoke (usually putting money in the pockets of huge and ethicalless corporations) a wee bit out of touch with what they preach. You know the average smoking habit takes 300 trees a year to support?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 11/19 queries in 0.011 seconds using memcached

Served from: 72.52.194.179 @ 2010-03-13 19:59:48 -->