Site Meter

VIDEO: Gap Defends Its Decision Not to Sign Bangladesh Safety Accord

Jobs With Justice, Gap, Banana Republic, Old Navy, Athleta, Piperlime, SumofUs, United Students Against Sweatshops, San Francisco, eco-fashion, sustainable fashion, green fashion, ethical fashion, sustainable style, Bangladesh, workers rights, human rights, sweatshops, sweatshop workers, sweatshop labor, forced labor, Bangladesh Fire and Building Safety Agreement, Accord on Fire and Building Safety

Photo by Northfoto/Shutterstock

As dozens of anti-sweatshop protestors faced arrest outside Gap’s annual shareholder meeting in San Francisco on Tuesday, the retail giant defended its decision not to sign the legally binding Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh. Although more than 40 Western brands and retailers, including Gap competitors such as H&M, Mango, and Zara, have agreed to hold themselves legally accountable for safety and labor conditions in the factories they employ in the South Asian nation, Gap has held back. But don’t mistake the company’s reticence for callousness, according to Angela Leung Wasmer, the company’s director of global public affairs. “Gap takes our commitments very seriously,” Wasmer says in a video on We Are Committed, a website Gap launched on Sunday to address the issue. “We see all of our commitments as things we will do each and every day.”

PREVIOUSLY ON ECOUTERRE: More Brands, Retailers Commit to Bangladesh Fire and Building Safety

HOLDING OUT

The retailer is “much closer than we are far apart” on the agreement, says Wasmer, adding that Gap wants to clarify some terms regarding dispute resolution before it can participate. The company, which owns the Banana Republic, Old Navy, Athleta, and Piperlime brands, also cites legal liability as a key sticking point. “We worry that labor is unnecessarily creating an environment where American companies may feel the risk is too high to remain committed to Bangladesh,” Gap spokesman Bill Chandler told CNN on Tuesday.

Labor advocates claim that Gap wants to remove a provision that makes the accord legally binding, rendering it unenforceable.

Labor advocates claim that Gap wants to remove a provision that makes the accord legally binding, rendering it unenforceable.

“Gap says it will sign the agreement, as long as it isn’t binding,” Rob Wohl, a campaigner with SumofUs.org, writes on the petition site. “That’s ridiculous. Even the rest of the garment industry acknowledges that corporate-controlled codes of conduct have failed and that legally binding safety standards are necesssary to ensure that the clothes we buy aren’t made in death traps.”

In other words, Wohl says, Gap is saying “we’ll sign, as long as no one can hold us accountable when we don’t follow through.”

“Non-binding, corporate-controlled codes of conduct have failed Bangladeshi workers for 20 year,” he adds. “A non-binding agreement is more of the same. Only a binding agreement can reform the garment industry in Bangladesh.”

Gap, Banana Republic, Old Navy, Athleta, Piperlime, SumofUs, United Students Against Sweatshops, San Francisco, eco-fashion, sustainable fashion, green fashion, ethical fashion, sustainable style, Bangladesh, workers rights, human rights, sweatshops, sweatshop workers, sweatshop labor, forced labor, Bangladesh Fire and Building Safety Agreement, Accord on Fire and Building Safety

Photo by Northfoto/Shutterstock

TAKE ACTION

Want to do your part? Wohl and SumofUs.org suggest the following ways you can help Gap “get the message”:

1. Call Gap’s customer service line at 800-427-7895 and press 4 to speak to a live representative. When you get an answer, let Gap know that it needs to sign a binding agreement to protect Bangladeshi workers. Some talking points:

  • The binding Bangladesh Fire and Building Safety Agreement is now the industry standard. More than 40 companies have signed on.
  • Non-binding, corporate-controlled codes of conduct have failed Bangladeshi workers for 20 years. A non-binding agreement is more of the same. Only a binding agreement can reform the garment industry in Bangladesh.
  • Many of Gap’s top competitors have signed the agreement, including H&M, Abercrombie & Fitch, Zara, and Benetton.

2. Click here to write on Gap’s Facebook wall. Here are some examples of messages you can leave for the company, or you can write your own.

  • Gap needs to make a stand, right now, to ensure that tragedies like Rana Plaza never happen again. Gap should stop trying to undermine the agreement by preventing it from being legally binding. Sign the Bangladesh Fire and Building Safety Agreement. http://on.fb.me/13woD9D
  • I will not shop at a store that gambles with people’s lives. By refusing to sign the Bangladesh Fire and Building Safety Agreement, Gap is displaying a disgusting level of greed. Stop putting lives at risk and sign now. http://on.fb.me/13woD9D
  • Gap’s refusal to sign the Bangladesh Fire and Building Safety Agreement is a disgrace to the company, and to everyone involved in decision-making. Shame on Gap. Stop dragging your feet and join the many other companies that have already signed the agreement. http://on.fb.me/13woD9D

3. Email Kindley Walsh-Lawlor, Gap’s vice president for social responsibility, at Kindley_Walsh-Lawlor@gap.com, or Eva Sage-Gavin, vice president for employee relations, at Eva_Sage-Gavin@gap.com. Some talking points:

  • The binding Bangladesh Fire and Building Safety Agreement is now the industry standard. More than 40 companies have signed on.
  • Non-binding, corporate-controlled codes of conduct have failed Bangladeshi workers for 20 years. A non-binding agreement is more of the same. Only a binding agreement can reform the garment industry in Bangladesh.
  • Many of Gap’s top competitors have signed the agreement, including H&M, Abercrombie & Fitch, Zara, and Benetton.

Gap, Banana Republic, Old Navy, Athleta, Piperlime, SumofUs, United Students Against Sweatshops, San Francisco, eco-fashion, sustainable fashion, green fashion, ethical fashion, sustainable style, Bangladesh, workers rights, human rights, sweatshops, sweatshop workers, sweatshop labor, forced labor, Bangladesh Fire and Building Safety Agreement, Accord on Fire and Building Safety

UPDATE | 5/22/2013
People are inundating Gap’s Facebook page to take the retailer to task for failing to sign the Bangladesh safety accord. A few shareholders at Gap’s annual meeting on Tuesday also questioned the retailer’s failure to sign the agreement, according to the New York Times. “In the United States, there’s maybe a bigger legal risk than there is in Europe,” Gap’s chief executive, Glenn Murphy, responded. “If we were to sign onto something that had unlimited legal liability and risk, I think our shareholders should care about that.”

JOIN THE SUMOFUS.ORG CAMPAIGN >

+ We Are Committed

+ Gap

Related Posts

3 Responses to “VIDEO: Gap Defends Its Decision Not to Sign Bangladesh Safety Accord”

  1. nicoleamurray says:

    >American companies may feel the risk is too high to remain committed to Bangladesh,”

    But it’s totally fine for Bangladeshi workers to risk cramming into firetrap buildings for 14 hours a day.

  2. TheMacrameProject (@@MacProj) says:

    It’s a Sham in my eyes. I would like to take a good look at the agreement itself to look at the small letters. I’m pretty sure they managed it get out of it without to much damage. As for Gap, Old Navy and the other companies unwilling to take responsibility I am at awhh.

    I just got finished recording a video about the Bangladesh tragedy.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CXEM9WhUTbc

    also check out http://www.TheMacrameProject.com for some Ehtical
    Fashion.

    Thanx

  3. tinalina says:

    Gap is free to defend their position, but I am free to cease shopping with their brands.

Leave a Comment

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.

Add your comments

NEW USER

Sign me up for weekly Ecouterre updates

Let's make sure you're a real person:

CURRENT USERS LOGIN

Lost your password?